KBA provided excellent communication and their follow-through was like clockwork!
KBA provided excellent communication and their follow-through was like clockwork!
Most landlords will retain a CPA firm to prepare their entity’s financial statements and tax returns. In many cases, a segment of these financial statements is delivered to tenants in support of their operating expense pass-through billings. Tenants must be careful to not rely on these statements to protect their rights, because such statements:
The standards utilized by a CPA when preparing financial statements may vary depending on the intended use of the statements. In general, for investment use, CPAs follow GAAP and other standards issued by the AICPA, FASB and other regulatory bodies. If statements are to be used for income tax purposes, CPAs must follow the IRS’s standards.
From a tenant’s perspective, neither of these is particularly relevant. The tenant wants to know that the expenditures are classified according to its lease, regardless of whether GAAP or the IRS would classify things differently. For example, a tenant’s lease may specifically exclude the cost of all capital expenditures (items that will last for more than one year) from operating expenses. However, both GAAP and the IRS often permit a landlord to expense such replacement costs if the amounts are “immaterial.” For landlords, materiality is viewed in the context of the overall building or building system, so everything except for major capital projects would be considered immaterial and would be allowed.
If the statement of operating expenses provided by the landlord was not specifically prepared for the tenant’s pass-through/escalation billing, it is highly likely that the costs charged to the tenant will not properly reflect those costs permitted by the lease and could result in overbillings to the tenant. Also, for the reasons discussed below, even when the CPA does prepare the statements based on the specific lease terms, the tenant should not assume all of the reported costs are correct.
The financial statements prepared by the landlord’s CPA firm are usually prepared for the landlord’s use. The certification (if any) is made to the landlord, and although the CPA firm has an obligation to follow the applicable account standards, applying such standards is a question of judgment. The tenant must remember that the CPA firm also has an obligation to consider the interests of its client and that its client is the landlord, not the tenant.
Although many leases start out on a standard form, most are negotiated and become unique. A building with 20 different tenants can have 20 different rent escalation clauses.
Even though the operating expense statements may be specifically prepared for use in billing tenant pass-throughs, they are usually based on the building’s standard lease form and do not take these variations into account.
Most CPAs are not real estate lease experts. As a result, many of the operating expense statements that are issued by CPA firms do not consider the nuances of real estate leasing. These nuances frequently affect the expenses billed to the tenant because many charges do not fit neatly into the definitions in the lease. It takes skilled judgment to identify, understand and treat these nuances properly.
Even though an operating or tax escalation bill may be accompanied by a financial statement certified by the landlord’s CPA firm, the tenant should understand the limitations of such statements and should not blindly accept them as valid or accurate for purposes of substantiating tenant charges. We have seen countless examples of incorrect pass-throughs based on financial statements certified as “correct” by landlords’ CPA firms.
Mark your calendar to get valuable pointers from two of the country’s top leasing experts. Marc E. Betesh, President of KBA Lease Services and Michael E. Meyer, Managing Partner of DLA Piper will teach you how to keep that great deal on track during the CoreNet Global Summit in New Orleans.
When uncontrolled, certain elements of lease deals can turn good deals into bad. Learn from industry experts how to negotiate operating expense language that is in line with underlying business goals, and how to ensure that leases stay on track post-execution. Click here to read Michael Meyer’s Checklist for Negotiating a Fair Lease Audit Provision.
Marc and Michael will be speaking and fielding your questions on Monday, April 19th during the Optimizing Resources Snap Session from 11:00 am to 12:30 pm.
Tenants often think that the only risk of deferring an audit of their lease this year is that they may be unable to recover any of this year’s overcharges. In fact, skipping a year of reviewing your charges can have a profound impact on your costs for the balance of your lease term. Here’s why.
Accepting billing practices may create a presumption that such practices are acceptable. Landlords will often argue that a tenant had an adequate chance to review their charges and object, and by deciding not to do so, accepted the underlying billing practices. To protect against this, there may be specific clauses in the lease that state that the tenant’s failure to object to a landlord breach does not constitute a waiver of its future right to do so. But in practical terms, allowing an improper practice to continue makes it much more difficult to correct in later years.
In addition, in Base Year leases, the tenant’s best opportunity to object to the structuring of the base year’s expenses is early in the term when the expenses are fresh. As with improper billing practices, if the base year is understated, it will result in overstatements of the operating expense and other escalations for the duration of the lease term. Any such understatements should be identified and discussed with your landlord immediately, before they have a chance to become embedded in the landlord’s financial plan. Landlords’ projections of future income are rely on upon proper estimates of revenue from operating expense, tax and other escalations, and adjustments to base years raise significant issues as to future income projections.

Small errors in calculation of your base year can add up to significant costs every year of the lease.












Great results. Very professional with clear and excellent follow-up.
We were very impressed. Very professional with clear and excellent follow-up.
Great job! Very professional and responsive!
KBA is by far one of the most effective lease audit firms we have ever used.



KBA provided us with a variety of solution options and were patient as we selected the one that worked best for us.
KBA has been fantastic. They've helped us with everything from lease questions to audits and negotiations.
Small errors in calculation of your base year can add up to significant costs every year of the lease.
KBA is by far one of the most effective lease audit firms we have ever used.



Never before have I had such a pleasant experience with lease audits. You make it so easy!
KBA provided excellent communication and their follow-through was like clockwork!